9 Best Sentry Alternatives for Error Tracking and Debugging 

Introduction to Sentry and Its Alternatives

Sentry is known among developers for tracking errors and performance in their applications. Although Sentry is helpful, certain teams might seek alternatives based on cost, features, or integration possibilities. The following article is our attempt to list the leading Sentry alternatives to help users with different requirements, including session replay, log management, and full-stack observability.

Why consider Sentry vs other alternatives?

• Pricing concerns: Some users think that pricing for Sentry is high as they use Sentry more.
  
• Feature constraints: Users may require a greater observability stack than error tracking.
• Scalability and customization: Others offer more flexibility and cost predictability.
• Integration needs: Teams may favor products that are better integrated into their tech stack.

List of the 9 best Sentry Alternatives

1. LiveSession

Overview
LiveSession is designed for teams seeking actionable insights into user behavior. It offers session replays, analytics, and filtering to help product and development teams diagnose usability and technical issues efficiently.

Key Features

• Session Replays – Replay user interactions to understand issues visually.
• Advanced Filtering – Find sessions based on user actions, errors, or events.
• Dev Tools – Inspect JavaScript errors, network requests, and console logs.
• Product Analytics – Build funnels, track events, and analyze user behavior.
• Custom Dashboards – Personalize analytics views based on team needs.
• Webhooks & Integrations – Connect LiveSession with Slack and other tools.

🏷️ Pricing Information

• Free, Pro starts at $65/month, with a 14-day free trial available.

LiveSession offers a pricing model that starts at $0, with a pro option available for $65 per month. Additionally, it provides a 14-day free trial, allowing teams to test its features before committing.

📣  G2 Reviews

• G2 Score: 4.6/5

Users have rated LiveSession an impressive 4.6 out of 5 on G2. They commend its affordability, ease of use, and intuitive UI design.

Comparison to Sentry
In comparison to Sentry, which excels in error tracking and performance monitoring, LiveSession stands out as a strong alternative. While Sentry focuses on real-time error tracking and crash reporting, LiveSession provides deeper insights through session replays and comprehensive analytics. This makes it an ideal choice for those seeking a robust monitoring solution that emphasizes user behavior. For teams exploring alternatives to Sentry, LiveSession offers a unique combination of instrumentation and real user monitoring capabilities. It allows teams to pinpoint issues effectively and optimize user experience.In conclusion, if you are looking for a performance monitoring tool that goes beyond standard error tracking, consider LiveSession. Its user-centric approach makes it a valuable addition to your monitoring tools.

2. Bugsnag (Now Insights Hub)

Overview
Insights Hub (previously BugSnag) is an error-monitoring and stability-management platform used by development teams for real-time issue tracking.

Key Features

Insights Hub offers comprehensive error tracking capabilities and emphasizes stability management. It integrates automated workflows, which can be a strong alternative to Sentry for those looking for a unified platform. However, while it combines error and performance data, users often find that its reporting and workflow management features fall short compared to Sentry’s robust offerings.

• Real-Time Error Monitoring – Detect and fix issues as they occur.
• Automatic Error Grouping – Organize similar errors to prioritize fixes.
• Detailed Error Reports – Get full stack traces and context for debugging.
• Release Tracking – Monitor stability across app versions.
• Custom Filtering – Search errors based on criteria that matter.

🏷️ Pricing Information

• Free plan available; paid plans start at $23/month for 50,000 events.

Insights Hub has an accessible free plan, but paid options start at $23 per month for 50,000 events. This pricing can be competitive, but it may not provide the best value for teams that require more advanced application monitoring features available in tools like Datadog or New Relic.

📣 G2 Reviews

• G2 Score: 4.3/5

With a G2 score of 4.3 out of 5, users appreciate the platform's simplicity. However, many critics express a desire for improved reporting and workflow management. This highlights a gap in user expectations versus current capabilities.

Comparison to Sentry

When comparing Insights Hub to Sentry, the latter excels in monitoring features and offers a more comprehensive observability solution. While Insights Hub may fit certain use cases, it is essential to consider leading Sentry alternatives like Rollbar or Datadog for teams needing better stack logs and debugging tools.

3. Better Stack

Overview
Better Stack is an observability platform designed to help developers and IT teams maintain high system availability and performance through monitoring and logging.

Key Features

Better Stack combines error tracking, real-user monitoring, and host monitoring to give teams a comprehensive view of their systems. However, compared to more established platforms, it lacks some advanced features. While it does provide real-time insights, it falls short in ease of integration, particularly during initial setup.

• Real-Time Application and Website Monitoring – Get instant alerts on downtime.
• Log Management – Centralized logs for quick debugging.
• Custom Dashboards – Build personalized monitoring views.
• API Integrations – Connect with essential DevOps tools.
• Root Cause Analysis – Identify and resolve performance issues.
• Anomaly Detection – Proactively find unusual system behavior.

🏷️ Pricing Information

• Free plan available; pay-as-you-go plans start at $34/month.

Better Stack offers a free plan, but for teams needing more, pay-as-you-go plans start at $34 per month. This flexibility can be appealing, but it may not provide the depth of monitoring and analysis that other platforms, like Datadog, offer at higher pricing tiers.

📣 G2 Reviews

• G2 Score: 4.8/5

On G2, Better Stack holds a score of 4.8/5. Users appreciate its ease of use and monitoring capabilities but express frustration over the initial setup process. This feedback highlights a common pain point that could deter potential users.

Comparison to Sentry

When comparing Better Stack to Sentry, it’s clear that Sentry excels in error tracking and debugging. Sentry is designed for precise error management, making it a strong alternative for teams focused on that aspect. In contrast, Better Stack’s broader observability may not meet the specific needs of those searching for leading Sentry alternatives. In conclusion, while Better Stack offers valuable features, its challenges in setup and depth compared to competitors like Sentry and Datadog warrant careful consideration.

4. Highlight.io

Overview
Highlight.io is an open-source observability platform offering session replay, logging, and tracing for developers.

Key Features

Highlight.io offers essential features such as session replay, error monitoring, logging, tracing, and dashboards. This combination aims to provide a comprehensive view of your application's performance. However, while it does capture cross-stack visibility, it often feels like it lacks depth in error tracking compared to some leading Sentry alternatives. The learning curve can be steep, making it challenging for new users to maximize its potential.

• Session Replay – Reconstruct user interactions for debugging.
• Error Monitoring – Track frontend and backend issues together.
• Logging – Monitor system logs and correlate them with user sessions.
• Tracing – Analyze request and transaction performance.
• Dashboards & Metrics – Visualize data for better insights.

🏷️ Pricing Information

• Free plan includes 500 sessions and 1,000 errors per month. Paid plans are pay-as-you-go.

📣 G2 Reviews

• No reviews

User reviews on other forums like Reddit show a mix of appreciation and caution. While many appreciate the tool's cross-stack capabilities, the consensus is that it requires a significant investment of time to learn.

Comparison to Sentry

When comparing Highlight.io to Sentry, it is clear that Highlight.io’s focus on frontend insights sets it apart. However, Sentry provides a more robust error tracking experience, making it a better choice for teams prioritizing error monitoring. In summary, while Highlight.io is a promising tool, it may not yet be the best Sentry alternative for all users, especially given its lack of presence on portals like G2.

5. Axiom

Overview
Axiom reinvents log management with competitive pricing, attracting tech companies like Asana, Vercel, and Netlify.

Key Features

Axiom provides dashboards for observability, distributed tracing, and infrastructure monitoring. While it aims to optimize app response times, it primarily focuses on log management rather than error tracking. This is a significant downside for those who expect a full-stack observability experience. Compared to leading Sentry alternatives, Axiom falls short in addressing error monitoring effectively.

• Dashboards – Visualize and analyze log data in real time.
• Observability – Gain full insight into applications and infrastructure.
• Distributed Tracing – Analyze request flow across microservices.
• Infrastructure Monitoring – Detect system performance bottlenecks.
• Application Performance Monitoring (APM) – Optimize app response times.

🏷️ Pricing Information

• Free plan available; paid plans start at $25/month for 1TB of log data.

Axiom has a free plan, which is a nice entry point. However, paid plans start at $25/month for just 1TB of log data. This pricing structure may not offer great value, especially for teams looking for a more robust solution that combines error monitoring with log management.

📣 G2 Reviews

• No G2 Profile

Although Axiom does not have a G2 profile, it has received some positive feedback on Reddit. However, relying on informal reviews can be risky. Users might find themselves disappointed when the product doesn’t meet their expectations.

Comparison to Sentry

Sentry is a leading choice for developers seeking error tracking solutions, while Axiom often falls short. Sentry's robust SDK and seamless integrations make it an effective alternative for those focused on error management.
In conclusion, while Axiom offers intriguing features, it pales in comparison to Sentry. Those seeking a comprehensive solution for monitoring and troubleshooting should consider Sentry and its list of alternatives, as it remains a strong contender in the APM tool space.

6. LogRocket

Overview
LogRocket is a session replay and error-tracking tool designed primarily for frontend monitoring. It helps developers understand user issues by recording sessions and providing detailed insights into performance and errors.

Key Features

One notable feature is session replays, which allow teams to watch real user interactions on their site. This can be valuable for identifying usability issues. Additionally, LogRocket provides Application Performance Monitoring (APM) to analyze frontend performance metrics. This helps teams understand how their applications are performing in real-time. It also includes error tracking, which is essential for addressing issues as they occur.

• Session replays: Capture and replay user interactions to debug issues faster.
• Performance monitoring: Analyze frontend performance metrics to improve speed and responsiveness.
• Error tracking: Identify and resolve issues with detailed stack traces.

🏷️ Pricing Information

• Starts at $99/month, with a 14-day free trial available.

Pricing for LogRocket starts at $99 per month, and there is a 14-day free trial available. While this might seem reasonable, some users find the cost high given the complexity of setup.

📣 G2 Reviews

• G2 Score: 4.6/5

G2 reviews reflect this sentiment, with a score of 4.6/5. However, many users voice concerns regarding the price and the intricate setup process, which can be a barrier for smaller teams.

Comparison to Sentry:
When comparing LogRocket to Sentry, it becomes clear that LogRocket specializes in frontend debugging, while Sentry focuses on application-level monitoring. If your primary need is to improve user experience through effective frontend issue resolution, LogRocket or LiveSession are viable options among Sentry alternatives. However, Sentry may still be the better choice. In the ongoing debate of Sentry vs. LogRocket, it’s essential to weigh your specific needs carefully.

7. DataDog

Overview
Datadog is a cloud-based monitoring, security, and analytics platform designed for developers, IT teams, and security engineers. It provides a comprehensive observability stack covering infrastructure, applications, logs, and security.

Key Features:

• Application Performance Monitoring (APM): Full-stack performance insights.
• Log management: Centralized log analysis for quick troubleshooting.
• Security monitoring: Detect and respond to threats in real time.
• Integrations: Wide range of integrations with cloud providers, databases, and applications.

🏷️ Pricing Information

Datadog’s pricing is usage-based and tiered, making costs unpredictable, especially for smaller teams.

📣 G2 Reviews

G2 Score: 4.3/5. Users appreciate its comprehensive features but mention complexity, high costs, and a steep learning curve.

Comparison to Sentry:
Datadog provides a broader observability platform compared to Sentry, covering infrastructure, logs, and security. However, its complexity and pricing structure may not suit smaller teams looking for a straightforward error-tracking solution.

8. SigNoz

Overview
SigNoz is an open-source observability platform offering cost-effective monitoring for cloud-native applications. It is popular among mid-market companies looking for an alternative to Datadog with predictable pricing.

Key Features

SigNoz offers several features including Application Performance Monitoring (APM), distributed tracing, and Kubernetes monitoring. It provides unified metrics, logs, and traces, along with live log tailing. These features are essential for developers looking for a comprehensive monitoring solution. However, the user experience can be challenging due to its open-source nature, which may not be as polished as commercial offerings.

• APM & distributed tracing: Monitor application performance with distributed traces.
• Kubernetes monitoring: Gain insights into Kubernetes workloads.
• Unified metrics/logs/traces: Correlate data across different observability sources.
• Live log tailing: View real-time logs for faster debugging.
• Alert management: Set up alerts across multiple channels.
• SSO/SAML support: Enterprise-grade security features.

🏷️ Pricing Information

• Starts at $199+/month with usage-based pricing

SigNoz's pricing starts at $199+ per month with a usage-based model. Unlike Sentry, it does not charge per user or per host. The base plan includes 15-day data retention, which may not be sufficient for every organization. This pricing structure can be appealing, but the lack of robust features may make it less competitive.

📣 G2 Reviews

• No G2 Profile

Currently, SigNoz does not have a presence on G2. This absence raises questions about its overall reputation and reliability within the observability space. Users often rely on reviews to make informed choices, and this lack of visibility is a significant drawback.

Comparison to Sentry:
When comparing SigNoz to Sentry, it becomes clear that while SigNoz is a budget-friendly option, it falls short in terms of user experience and support. Sentry offers a more refined solution with better community backing, making it a more effective alternative for error tracking. SigNoz may be suitable for those seeking open-source flexibility, but it may not be the best choice for everyone. In conclusion, while SigNoz presents itself as an option among leading Sentry alternatives, its limitations could push potential users towards more established platforms.

9. Splunk

Overview
Splunk, now part of Cisco, is a security and observability platform designed to enhance resilience against cyber threats and operational downtime. It leverages AI to improve detection, investigation, and response.

Key Features

Splunk offers unified monitoring for security and operational data, handling events, logs, and metrics. Its enterprise-focused observability platform includes AI-driven security insights, making it a robust framework for large organizations. However, Splunk's complexity may be overkill for smaller teams seeking simpler sentry alternatives for error tracking.

• Advanced search and analytics: Process large datasets for in-depth insights.
• Machine learning and AI: Accelerate issue detection and response.
• Events, logs, and metrics: Unified monitoring for security and operational data.

🏷️ Pricing Information

• Pricing is not publicly available

Pricing for Splunk isn't publicly available, requiring contact with sales. This lack of transparency can be frustrating for organizations trying to compare costs with other APM alternatives or sentry SDK options.

📣 G2 Reviews

• G2 Score: 4.3/5

G2 reviews give Splunk a 4.3/5 score. Users praise its powerful analytics but criticize the costly licensing model and the difficult query interface. Whereas Sentry offers a more user-friendly approach, Splunk's learning curve can be steep.

Comparison to Sentry

Compared to leading Sentry alternatives, Splunk is a heavyweight solution. It may be overkill for teams that just need error tracking or uptime monitoring. Several alternatives like LiveSession or others from our list of sentry alternatives offer more focused, cost-effective options. Splunk requires significant resources to implement and maintain, potentially making it less appealing for organizations looking to switch to Sentry or find an effective Sentry alternative.

‍